1.10. Automatic parallelization with @jit¶

1.10.1. Supported Operations¶

In this section, we give a list of all the array operations that have parallel semantics and for which we attempt to parallelize.

1. All numba array operations that are supported by Case study: Array Expressions, which include common arithmetic functions between Numpy arrays, and between arrays and scalars, as well as Numpy ufuncs. They are often called element-wise or point-wise array operations:

   • unary operators: + - ~
   • binary operators: + - * / /? % | >> ^ << & ** //
   • comparison operators: == != < <= > >=
   • Numpy ufuncs that are supported in nopython mode.
   • User defined DUFunc through vectorize().

2. Numpy reduction functions sum, prod, min, max, argmin, and argmax. Also, array math functions mean, var, and std.

3. Numpy array creation functions zeros, ones, arange, linspace, and several random functions (rand, randn, ranf, random_sample, sample, random, standard_normal, chisquare, weibull, power, geometric, exponential, poisson, rayleigh, normal, uniform, beta, binomial, f, gamma, lognormal, laplace, randint, triangular).

4. Numpy dot function between a matrix and a vector, or two vectors. In all other cases, Numba’s default implementation is used.

5. Multi-dimensional arrays are also supported for the above operations when operands have matching dimension and size. The full semantics of Numpy broadcast between arrays with mixed dimensionality or size is not supported, nor is the reduction across a selected dimension.

6. Array assignment in which the target is an array selection using a slice or a boolean array, and the value being assigned is either a scalar or another selection where the slice range or bitarray are inferred to be compatible.

7. The reduce operator of functools is supported for specifying parallel reductions on 1D Numpy arrays but the initial value argument is mandatory.

1.10.2. Explicit Parallel Loops¶

Another feature of this code transformation pass is support for explicit parallel loops. One can use Numba’s prange instead of range to specify that a loop can be parallelized. The user is required to make sure that the loop does not have cross iteration dependencies except for supported reductions.

A reduction is inferred automatically if a variable is updated by a binary function/operator using its previous value in the loop body. The initial value of the reduction is inferred automatically for += and *= operators. For other functions/operators, the reduction variable should hold the identity value right before entering the prange loop. Reductions in this manner are supported for scalars and for arrays of arbitrary dimensions.

The example below demonstrates a parallel loop with a reduction (A is a one-dimensional Numpy array):

from numba import njit, prange
@njit(parallel=True)
def prange_test(A):
    s = 0
    for i in prange(A.shape[0]):
        s += A[i]
    return s

The following example demonstrates a product reduction on a two-dimensional array:

from numba import njit, prange
import numpy as np

@njit(parallel=True)
def two_d_array_reduction_prod(n):
    shp = (13, 17)
    result1 = 2 * np.ones(shp, np.int_)
    tmp = 2 * np.ones_like(result1)

    for i in prange(n):
        result1 *= tmp

    return result1

1.10.3. Examples¶

In this section, we give an example of how this feature helps parallelize Logistic Regression:

@numba.jit(nopython=True, parallel=True)
def logistic_regression(Y, X, w, iterations):
    for i in range(iterations):
        w -= np.dot(((1.0 / (1.0 + np.exp(-Y * np.dot(X, w))) - 1.0) * Y), X)
    return w

We will not discuss details of the algorithm, but instead focus on how this program behaves with auto-parallelization:

1. Input Y is a vector of size N, X is an N x D matrix, and w is a vector of size D.
2. The function body is an iterative loop that updates variable w. The loop body consists of a sequence of vector and matrix operations.
3. The inner dot operation produces a vector of size N, followed by a sequence of arithmetic operations either between a scalar and vector of size N, or two vectors both of size N.
4. The outer dot produces a vector of size D, followed by an inplace array subtraction on variable w.
5. With auto-parallelization, all operations that produce array of size N are fused together to become a single parallel kernel. This includes the inner dot operation and all point-wise array operations following it.
6. The outer dot operation produces a result array of different dimension, and is not fused with the above kernel.

Here, the only thing required to take advantage of parallel hardware is to set the parallel option for jit(), with no modifications to the logistic_regression function itself. If we were to give an equivalence parallel implementation using guvectorize(), it would require a pervasive change that rewrites the code to extract kernel computation that can be parallelized, which was both tedious and challenging.

1.10.4. Diagnostics¶

The parallel option for jit() can produce diagnostic information about the transforms undertaken in automatically parallelizing the decorated code. This information can be accessed in two ways, the first is by setting the environment variable NUMBA_PARALLEL_DIAGNOSTICS, the second is by calling parallel_diagnostics(), both methods give the same information and print to STDOUT. The level of verbosity in the diagnostic information is controlled by an integer argument of value between 1 and 4 inclusive, 1 being the least verbose and 4 the most. For example:

@njit(parallel=True)
def test(x):
    n = x.shape[0]
    a = np.sin(x)
    b = np.cos(a * a)
    acc = 0
    for i in prange(n - 2):
        for j in prange(n - 1):
            acc += b[i] + b[j + 1]
    return acc

test(np.arange(10))

test.parallel_diagnostics(level=4)

produces:

================================================================================
======= Parallel Accelerator Optimizing:  Function test, example.py (4)  =======
================================================================================


Parallel loop listing for  Function test, example.py (4)
--------------------------------------|loop #ID
@njit(parallel=True)                  |
def test(x):                          |
    n = x.shape[0]                    |
    a = np.sin(x)---------------------| #0
    b = np.cos(a * a)-----------------| #1
    acc = 0                           |
    for i in prange(n - 2):-----------| #3
        for j in prange(n - 1):-------| #2
            acc += b[i] + b[j + 1]    |
    return acc                        |
--------------------------------- Fusing loops ---------------------------------
Attempting fusion of parallel loops (combines loops with similar properties)...
Trying to fuse loops #0 and #1:
    - fusion succeeded: parallel for-loop #1 is fused into for-loop #0.
Trying to fuse loops #0 and #3:
    - fusion failed: loop dimension mismatched in axis 0. slice(0, x_size0.1, 1)
!= slice(0, $40.4, 1)
----------------------------- Before Optimization ------------------------------
Parallel region 0:
+--0 (parallel)
+--1 (parallel)


Parallel region 1:
+--3 (parallel)
+--2 (parallel)


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------ After Optimization ------------------------------
Parallel region 0:
+--0 (parallel, fused with loop(s): 1)


Parallel region 1:
+--3 (parallel)
+--2 (serial)



Parallel region 0 (loop #0) had 1 loop(s) fused.

Parallel region 1 (loop #3) had 0 loop(s) fused and 1 loop(s) serialized as part
of the larger parallel loop (#3).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------Loop invariant code motion---------------------------

Instruction hoisting:
loop #0:
Failed to hoist the following:
    dependency: $arg_out_var.10 = getitem(value=x, index=$parfor__index_5.99)
    dependency: $0.6.11 = getattr(value=$0.5, attr=sin)
    dependency: $expr_out_var.9 = call $0.6.11($arg_out_var.10, func=$0.6.11, args=[Var($arg_out_var.10, example.py (7))], kws=(), vararg=None)
    dependency: $arg_out_var.17 = $expr_out_var.9 * $expr_out_var.9
    dependency: $0.10.20 = getattr(value=$0.9, attr=cos)
    dependency: $expr_out_var.16 = call $0.10.20($arg_out_var.17, func=$0.10.20, args=[Var($arg_out_var.17, example.py (8))], kws=(), vararg=None)
loop #3:
Has the following hoisted:
    $const58.3 = const(int, 1)
    $58.4 = _n_23 - $const58.3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To aid users unfamiliar with the transforms undertaken when the parallel option is used, and to assist in the understanding of the subsequent sections, the following definitions are provided:

• Loop fusion

  Loop fusion is a technique whereby loops with equivalent bounds may be combined under certain conditions to produce a loop with a larger body (aiming to improve data locality).

• Loop serialization

  Loop serialization occurs when any number of prange driven loops are present inside another prange driven loop. In this case the outermost of all the prange loops executes in parallel and any inner prange loops (nested or otherwise) are treated as standard range based loops. Essentially, nested parallelism does not occur.

• Loop invariant code motion

  Loop invariant code motion is an optimization technique that analyses a loop to look for statements that can be moved outside the loop body without changing the result of executing the loop, these statements are then “hoisted” out of the loop to save repeated computation.

• Allocation hoisting

  Allocation hoisting is a specialized case of loop invariant code motion that is possible due to the design of some common NumPy allocation methods. Explanation of this technique is best driven by an example:

  @njit(parallel=True)
  def test(n):
      for i in prange(n):
          temp = np.zeros((50, 50)) # <--- Allocate a temporary array with np.zeros()
          for j in range(50):
              temp[j, j] = i
  
      # ...do something with temp
  

  internally, this is transformed to approximately the following:

  @njit(parallel=True)
  def test(n):
      for i in prange(n):
          temp = np.empty((50, 50)) # <--- np.zeros() is rewritten as np.empty()
          temp[:] = 0               # <--- and then a zero initialisation
          for j in range(50):
              temp[j, j] = i
  
      # ...do something with temp
  

  then after hoisting:

  @njit(parallel=True)
  def test(n):
      temp = np.empty((50, 50)) # <--- allocation is hoisted as a loop invariant as `np.empty` is considered pure
      for i in prange(n):
          temp[:] = 0           # <--- this remains as assignment is a side effect
          for j in range(50):
              temp[j, j] = i
  
      # ...do something with temp
  

  it can be seen that the np.zeros allocation is split into an allocation and an assignment, and then the allocation is hoisted out of the loop in i, this producing more efficient code as the allocation only occurs once.